What Do We Know About Financial Returns on Investments in Patient Safety? A Literature Review



      A framework was proposed for making a business case for patient safety interventions and to evaluate whether and how thoroughly financial aspects of investments and returns have been reported.


      MEDLINE was searched from inception through January 21, 2005. Articles were selected if they reported on a patient safety intervention or a patient safety related outcome within the United States and indicated that a financial or economic analysis of the intervention was an objective.


      For 165 articles, a financial or economic analysis was indicated as an objective; 36.4% used original data, 28.5% used referenced data, and 35.2% provided no analysis. Only 13 articles (7.9%) included original data on start-up costs, 45 articles (27.3%) included original data on operating expenses and benefits, and 9 articles (5.5%) provided original financial data on outcomes. Of the 165 articles, 56.4% evaluated technological methods of improving patient safety, such as adoption of computer physician order entry, 20.6% evaluated changes in processes of care, such as staffing changes, and 23% involved other types of interventions or outcomes.


      Few articles provided complete information on the required investment and anticipated return on patient safety interventions. Use of standard financial techniques may strengthen the business case for patient safety interventions.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Institute of Medicine
        To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.
        National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.2000
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Birkmeyer C.M.
        • Skinner J.S.
        The Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety.
        Leapfrog Patient Safety Standards: Economic Implications. The Leapfrog Group, Washington, D.C.2001
        • Poon E.G.
        • et al.
        Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals.
        Health Aff (Millwood). Jul.-Aug. 2004; 23: 184-190
        • Miller R.H.
        • Sim I.
        Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: Barriers and solutions.
        Health Aff (Millwood). Mar.–Apr. 2004; 23: 116-126
        • Ash J.S.
        • et al.
        Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: Results of a 2002 survey.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. Mar.–Apr. 2004; 11: 95-99
        • Overhage J.M.
        • et al.
        Does national regulatory mandate of provider order entry portend greater benefit than risk for health care delivery? The 2001 ACMI debate.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. May–Jun. 2002; 9: 199-208
        • Mousin G.
        • Remmlinger W.
        • Weil J.P.
        IT integration options for integrated delivery systems.
        Healthc Financ Manage. Feb. 1999; 53: 46-50
        • Bazzoli F.
        Justifying where the dollars go.
        Health Data Manage. Feb. 1998; 6 (62,64 passim): 58-60
        • Krohn R.
        In search of the ROI from CPOE.
        J Healthc Info Manag. Fall 2003; 17: 6-9
        • Ohsfeldt R.L.
        • et al.
        Implementation of hospital computerized physician order entry systems in a rural state: Feasibility and financial impact.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. Jan.-Feb. 2005; 12: 20-27
        • Weeks W.B.
        • Bagian J.P.
        Making the business case for patient safety.
        Jt Comm J Qual Saf. Jan. 2003; 29: 51-54
        • Warburton R.N.
        Patient safety: How much is enough?.
        Health Policy. Feb. 2005; 71: 223-232
        • Bates D.W.
        • et al.
        A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. Jan.– Feb. 2003; 10: 1-10
        • Balas E.A.
        • et al.
        Interpreting cost analyses of clinical interventions.
        JAMA. Jan. 7, 1998; 279: 54-57
        • Stone P.W.
        • Larson E.
        • Kawar L.N.
        A systematic audit of economic evidence linking nosocomial infections and infection control interventions: 1990–2000.
        Am J Infect Control. May 2002; 30: 145-152
        • Neal T.
        Justifying an information system.
        Am J Hosp Pharm. Mar. 1993; 50: 476-482
        • Bergeron B.P.
        • Bergeron R.A.
        The return on investment for information technology.
        J Med Pract Manage. Jul.–Aug. 1998; 14: 43-50
        • Agrawal A.
        Return on investment analysis for a computer-based patient record in the outpatient clinic setting.
        J Ass Acad Minor Phys. Jul. 2002; 13: 61-65
        • Leonard K.A.
        Investment in information technology: The dilemma of comparing costs to benefits.
        Hosp Q. Summer 1998; 1: 55-56
        • Renner K.
        Cost-justifying electronic medical records.
        Healthc Financ Manage. Oct. 1996; 50 (66,68 passim): 63-64
        • Kosel K.
        • Rosenstein A.
        • Vance J.
        VHA Inc.: United to Improve America’s Health.: The business case for patient safety and clinical quality (unpublished manuscript).
        VHA, Inc, Irving, TXSep. 2001
        • Atkinson A.A.
        • et al.
        Management Accounting. Prentice-Hall International Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1995
        • Cooper R.
        • Kaplan R.S.
        Activity-based systems: measuring the costs of resource usage.
        Accounting Horizons. 1992; 6: 1-13
        • Newell L.M.
        • Christensen D.
        Who’s counting now? ROI for patient safety IT initiatives.
        J Healthc Info Manag. Fall 2003; 17: 29-35
        • Waldman J.D.
        • Yourstone S.A.
        • Smith H.L.
        Learning curves in health care.
        Health Care Manage Rev. Jan.–Mar. 2003; 28: 41-51
        • Wang S.J.
        • et al.
        A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.
        Am J Med. Apr. 1, 2003; 114: 397-403
        • Weeks W.B.
        Quality improvement as an investment.
        Qual Manag Health Care. Spring 2002; 10: 55-64
        • Haugh R.
        ROI: Return on investment? Or relying on instinct?.
        H&HN. Jan. 2002; 76: 38-40
        • Taylor R.
        • Manzo J.
        • Sinnett M.
        Quantifying value for physician order-entry systems: A balance of cost and quality.
        Healthc Financ Manage. Jul. 2002; 56: 44-48
        • Chaiken B.P.
        Clinical ROI: Not just costs versus benefits.
        J Healthc Info Manag. Fall 2003; 17: 36-41