Advertisement

AHRQ Series on Improving Translation of Evidence: Linking Evidence Reports and Performance Measures to Help Learning Health Systems Use New Information for Improvement

      Background

      Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) reports are lengthy and difficult for health systems to navigate. A quality measure index was created to allow health systems to more efficiently access information relevant to their needs.

      Methods

      Two tables were embedded in an EPC report. The first identified quality measures covered by the report with descriptive information. The second contained page numbers in the report’s executive summary addressing these quality measures, with hyperlinks to navigate to those pages. The researchers received feedback on the tables from four health system representatives and enhanced the tables. An exercise with two health system–targeted scenarios was then created. Three trainees (one medical fellow and two pharmacy students) and two health system representatives from a large community and a small rural health system completed the exercise, with and without the enhanced tables. They timed how long it took to find answers to scenario questions and provided general feedback.

      Results

      It took 63.4% less time to find quality measure information when the hyperlinked quality measure indexing tables were used (11.0 ± 5.0 vs. 4.0 ± 3.5 minutes; p = 0.002). The health system representatives stated that the quality measure indexed tables were very easy to use and that if these tables were used in future reports they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to use quality measure–indexed EPC reports in the future.

      Conclusion

      A unique concept that can allow EPC reports to be more user friendly to health systems was identified. The refined quality measure–indexed tables enhanced the efficiency of finding information and the overall likability of the report.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • The Joint Commission
        Standards Interpretation Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
        • Advisory Board
        See Your Hospital’s 2017 Pay-for-Performance Penalty or Bonus.
        https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2017/01/23/hospital-p-4-p
        Date: Jan 23, 2017
        Date accessed: June 8, 2019
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National Impact Assessment of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures Report. Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. Feb 28, 2018
        Accessed. Jun 8, 2019;
        • Institute of Medicine
        Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2013 (Accessed Jun 8, 2019)
        • The Learning Healthcare Project
        Background. Accessed. Jun 8, 2019;
        • McGinnis J.M.
        Evidence-based medicine—engineering the Learning Healthcare System.
        Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 153: 145-157
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Understanding Health-Systems’ Use of and Need for Evidence to Inform Decisionmaking. White CM, et al. Research White Paper. AHRQ Publication No. 17(18)-EHC035-EG. Oct 2017. Accessed Jun 8, 2019. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/health-systems-research.pdf.

        • Barclay C.
        • et al.
        AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: implementing evidence-based screening and counseling for unhealthy alcohol use with Epic-based electronic health record tools.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019; 45: 745-754
        • Adam G.P.
        • et al.
        AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: web-based interactive presentation of systematic review reports.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019; 45: 629-638
      2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Assessing the Impact of Indexing Performance Measure Codes on the Perceived Value of EPC Reports to Health Systems. White CM, et al. Methods Research Report. AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC022-EF. Sep 2018. Accessed Jun 8, 2019. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-assessing-impact.pdf.

        • Villa L.
        • et al.
        Health care decision makers’ use of comparative effectiveness research: report from a series of focus groups.
        J Manag Care Pharm. 2013; 19: 745-754
      3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review Update. Balk E, et al. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 212. AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC016-EF. Aug 2018. Accessed Jun 8, 2019. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cer-212-urinary-incontinence-updated_1.pdf.