Advertisement

Using a Modified Surprise Question as a Tool to Improve Primary Palliative Care in a Neurocritical Care Unit

Published:November 24, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.11.013

      Background

      Specialty palliative care is a limited resource. The surprise question (“Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?”) is a screening tool for clinicians to identify people nearing the end of life. The researchers used a modified surprise question (MSQ) to improve primary palliative care in a neurocritical care unit.

      Methods

      A palliative care physician attended interdisciplinary rounds up to three days a week and asked the primary neurocritical care team, for each patient admitted in the previous 24 hours, the MSQ: “Would you be surprised if this patient died during this hospital stay?” If the response was “No,” the unit social worker identified the patient's surrogate decision maker (SDM), and the primary team was encouraged to conduct a goals of care (GOC) conversation. The frequency of SDM documentation, occurrence and timing of GOC conversations, and palliative care and hospice consultations were measured for the baseline six months before the intervention, and six months after.

      Results

      Among 350 patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit during the study, the age, gender, prehospitalization presence of advance directives, and mortality were comparable between the baseline (n = 173) and intervention (n = 177) periods. Compared to the baseline period, there was a higher frequency during the intervention period of documentation of SDM (31.8% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.00002), all GOC conversations (35.3% vs. 53.1%, p = 0.008), GOC conversations conducted by the primary team (27.2% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.00009), palliative care consultations (11.6% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.004), and hospice consultations (2.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.004).

      Conclusion

      The MSQ can be used as a tool to identify the risk of mortality, facilitate palliative care delivered by the primary team, and improve end-of-life care.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Chuang E
        • et al.
        Gaps in Provision of primary and specialty palliative care in the acute care setting by race and ethnicity.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 54: 645-653.e1
        • Khandelwal N
        • et al.
        Estimating the effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU utilization.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 1102-1111
        • Society of Critical Care Medicine
        Critical Care Statistics.
        2019 (Accessed Dec 9, 2020.)
        • Etkind SN
        • et al.
        The role and response of palliative care and hospice services in epidemics and pandemics: a rapid review to inform practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020; 60 (e31–e40)
        • Quill TE
        • Abernethy AP.
        Generalist plus specialist palliative care—creating a more sustainable model.
        N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28; 368: 1173-1175
        • Tran LN
        • Back AL
        • Creutzfeldt CJ.
        Palliative care consultations in the neuro-ICU: a qualitative study.
        Neurocrit Care. 2016; 25: 266-272
        • Creutzfeldt CJ
        • et al.
        Palliative care needs in the neuro-ICU.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 1677-1684
        • Frontera JA
        • et al.
        Integrating palliative care into the care of neurocritically ill patients: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 1964-1977
      1. Vizient. About Us. Accessed Dec 9, 2020. https://www.vizientinc.com/about-us.

        • Hudson KE
        • et al.
        The surprise question and identification of palliative care needs among hospitalized patients with advanced hematologic or solid malignancies.
        J Palliat Med. 2018; 21: 789-795
        • White N
        • et al.
        How accurate is the ‘surprise question’ at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2; 15: 139
        • Ebke M
        • et al.
        The “surprise question” in neurorehabilitation—prognosis estimation by neurologist and palliative care physician; a longitudinal, prospective, observational study.
        Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 24; 9: 792
        • Huynh TN
        • et al.
        The opportunity cost of futile treatment in the intensive care unit.
        Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: 1977-1982
        • Billings JA
        • Bernacki R.
        Strategic targeting of advance care planning interventions.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 620-624
        • Lupu D
        • et al.
        Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010; 40: 899-911
        • Hua M
        • Wunsch H.
        Integrating palliative care in the ICU.
        Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014; 20: 673-680
        • Mamo JP.
        Issues with consent in stroke patients.
        West Indian Med J. 2014; 63: 510-513
        • Cai X
        • et al.
        Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in neuroscience intensive care units.
        Neurocrit Care. 2015; 23: 131-141
        • You JJ
        • et al.
        Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175: 549-556
        • Sanderson CR
        • et al.
        Patient-centered family meetings in palliative care: a quality improvement project to explore a new model of family meetings with patients and families at the end of life.
        Ann Palliat Med. 2017; 6: S195-S205
        • Piscitello GM
        • et al.
        The timing of family meetings in the medical intensive care unit.
        Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019; 36: 1049-1056
        • Weled BJ
        • et al.
        Critical care delivery: the importance of process of care and ICU structure to improved outcomes: an update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force on Models of Critical Care.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 1520-1525
        • Cook D
        • Rocker G.
        Dying with dignity in the intensive care unit.
        N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26; 370: 2506-2514