Advertisement

Self-Reported Learning (SRL), a Voluntary Incident Reporting System Experience Within a Large Health Care Organization

Published:January 16, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.01.002

      Background

      In aviation, significant improvements in safety have been attributed to a system of voluntary reporting of errors and hazards by pilots and other frontline personnel. Such a system is lacking in health care.

      Methods

      A system to allow physicians to self-report their clinical care errors along with insights to prevent recurrence (“self-reported learning [SRL] system”) was established in three hospitals and used for four years in one center and for two years in two others. Clinicians were educated in how to use the system and encouraged to report deviations from standard care by secure e-mail, a telephone hotline, or the institutional incident reporting system. Events were included in the SRL system only if clinicians self-reported them prior to others doing so. Submissions were analyzed for evidence of primary insight, recognition of error, and secondary insight. Physicians were surveyed afterward about their attitudes toward clinical peer review, the physician's role in errors, and the SRL program.

      Results

      There were 117 SRL submissions (less than 5% of clinical peer review cases); 86 had complete information available. Of these, there was agreement among two reviewers that secondary insight was present in 52.2%, and several were novel submissions that otherwise would have not been identified. Survey response rate was 18.3%; 31.1% of respondents had never been involved in clinical peer review before, a majority had an overall favorable impression of clinical peer review, and 47.2% reported not having made “any mistakes worth reporting.”

      Conclusion

      An SRL system modeled after the aviation reporting system elicited a low number of reports and did not decrease the number of clinical peer review reports. In a high proportion of SRL reports reporting physicians demonstrated secondary insight. Benefits to SRL reporting could be seen despite low number of self-reports.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Haltiwanger J. The Odds Of A Plane Crash Are One In 11 Million, Yet You’re Still Afraid. October 2, 2019. Accessed Feb 4, 2021. https://www.elitedaily.com/news/world/people-terrified-plane-crashes-even-though-rare/977885.

        • Institute of Medicine
        To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System.
        National Academy Press, Washington, DC2000
        • Sox Jr., HC
        • Woloshin S.
        How many deaths are due to medical error? Getting the number right.
        Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3: 277-283
        • Makary MA
        • Daniel M.
        Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US.
        BMJ. 2016 May 3; 353: i2139
      2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. TeamSTEPPS 2.0. Dec 2012. (Updated: Jun 2019.) Accessed Jan 21, 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/index.html.

        • Harper ML
        • Helmreich RL.
        • et al.
        Identifying barriers to the success of a reporting system.
        in: Henriksen K Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Implementation Issues, Rockville, MD2005: 167-179 (vol. 3Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityAccessed Jan 21, 2021)
        • US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
        Advisory Circular: Aviation Safety Reporting Program.
        Dec 16, 2011 (AC No. 00-46EAccessed Jan 21, 2021)
        • US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration
        Advisory Circular: Aviation Safety Reporting Program.
        Jun 15, 1979 (AC No. 00-46B)
        • Frankel AS
        • Leonard MW
        • Denham CR.
        Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: the tools to achieve high reliability.
        Health Serv Res. 2006; 41: 1690-1709
        • Milch CE
        • et al.
        Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events: an analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 165-170
        • Smith KS
        • et al.
        Physician attitudes and practices related to voluntary error and near-miss reporting.
        J Oncol Pract. 2014; 10: e350-e357
        • Bagenal J
        • Sahnan K
        • Shantikumar S.
        Comparing the attitudes and knowledge toward incident reporting in junior physicians and nurses in a district general hospital.
        J Patient Saf. 2016; 12: 51-53
        • Hewitt T
        • Chreim S
        • Forster A.
        Sociocultural factors influencing incident reporting among physicians and nurses: understanding frames underlying self- and peer-reporting practices.
        J Patient Saf. 2017; 13: 129-137
        • Eadie A
        Medical error reporting should it be mandatory in Scotland?.
        J Forensic Leg Med. 2012; 19: 437-441
        • Shojania KG
        • Wald H
        • Gross R.
        Understanding medical error and improving patient safety in the inpatient setting.
        Med Clin North Am. 2002; 86: 847-867
        • The Joint Commission
        Developing a reporting culture: learning from close calls and hazardous conditions.
        Sentinel Event Alert. Dec 11, 2018; (IssueAccessed Jan 21, 2021)
        • Reilly CA
        • et al.
        How well do incident reporting systems work on inpatient psychiatric units?.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019; 45: 63-69
        • Edwards MT
        • Benjamin EM.
        The process of peer review in U.S. hospitals.
        J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2009; 16: 461-467
        • Levine RE
        • et al.
        Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: students’ attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2007; 31: 19-24
        • Argyris C.
        Double loop learning in organizations.
        Harv Bus Rev. 1977; 55: 115-125
        • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Patient Safety Network
        Patient Safety Primer: Reporting Patient Safety Events.
        Sep 2019 (Updated:Accessed Jan 21, 2021)
      3. Scientific American. Health Care Professionals Make Mistakes, and That's Okay. Paulin IM, Marash C, Ortega R. Apr 25, 2018. Accessed Jan 21, 2021. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/health-care-professionals-make-mistakes-and-thats-okay/.

        • Rodziewicz TL
        • Housman B
        • Hipskind JE.
        Medical Error Prevention.
        StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL2020 (Updated: Oct 17, 2020.) Accessed Jan 21, 2021
        • Macrae C.
        The problem with incident reporting.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25: 71-75