Advertisement

Prevalence and Characteristics of Interruptions and Distractions During Surgical Counts

      Background

      Surgical counting is a complex and safety-critical task that requires sustained attention by multiple members of the surgical team in order to prevent the occurrence of an unintentionally retained foreign object. Interruptions and distractions in the operating room are common and can negatively affect task performance. However, the prevalence and sources of interruptions and distractions during safety-critical tasks, such as surgical counting, have not previously been quantified. An understanding of the characteristics of these events could be used to inform targeted improvements to patient safety.

      Methods

      Observations were conducted of surgical procedures in order to quantify and describe interruptions and distractions during surgical counting activities. Analysis was separated into phases: the initial count, additions to the surgical field, removals from the surgical field, and closure counts.

      Results

      Thirty-six surgical procedures were observed. Interruptions occurred in 10.0% of initial counts, 15.4% of additions, 23.5% of removals, and 33.3% of closure counts observed. The source of 80.4% of interruptions was a surgeon, usually asking the scrub nurse for an item. Distractions were present in 46.7% of initial counts, 38.5% of additions, 41.2% of removals, and 40.9% of closure counts observed. Common sources of distraction included music, conversations, people entering and exiting the theater, and ringing phones.

      Conclusion

      Interruptions and distractions are common during surgical counts and can significantly affect patient safety by jeopardizing the accuracy of the count. A number of suggestions are provided that could reduce interruptions and distractions and their consequences.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Duggan E.G.
        • et al.
        1,300 days and counting: a risk model approach to preventing retained foreign objects (RFOs).
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018; 44: 260-269
        • Freitas P.S.
        • et al.
        Surgical count process for prevention of retained surgical items: an integrative review.
        J Clin Nurs. 2016; 25: 1835-1847
        • Pelter M.M.
        • Stephens K.E.
        • Loranger D.
        An evaluation of a numbered surgical sponge product.
        AORN J. 2007; 85: 931-940
        • Koh R.Y.I.
        • et al.
        Measuring attention patterns and expertise of scrub nurses in the operating theatre in relation to reducing errors in surgical counts.
        Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2009; 53: 669-673
        • Anbalagan G.
        • Charleman J.E.
        Elsevier's Surgical Technology Exam Review.
        Elsevier, St. Louis2018
        • Antoniadis S.
        • et al.
        Identification and interference of intraoperative distractions and interruptions in operating rooms.
        J Surg Res. 2014 May 1; 188: 21-29
        • Healey A.N.
        • Sevdalis N.
        • Vincent C.A.
        Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.
        Ergonomics. Apr 15-May 15 2006; 49: 589-604
        • Ribeiro H.C.T.C.
        • et al.
        Distractions and interruptions in a surgical room: perception of nursing staff.
        Escola Anna Nery. 2018; 22e20180042
        • Wheelock A.
        • et al.
        The impact of operating room distractions on stress, workload, and teamwork.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 1079-1084
        • Institute of Medicine
        To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.
        National Academy Press, Washington DC2000
        • Brixey J.J.
        • et al.
        Interruptions in a level one trauma center: a case study.
        Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77: 235-241
        • Lee B.C.
        • Chung K.
        • Kim S.-H.
        Interruption cost evaluation by cognitive workload and task performance in interruption coordination modes for human–computer interaction tasks.
        Appl Sci (Basel). 2018; 8: 1780
        • Balas M.C.
        • Scott L.D.
        • Rogers A.E.
        The prevalence and nature of errors and near errors reported by hospital staff nurses.
        Appl Nurs Res. 2004; 17 (–130): 224
        • Carlton G.
        • Blegen M.A.
        Medication-related errors: a literature review of incidence and antecedents.
        Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2006; 24: 19-38
      1. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. Distractions and Their Impact on Patient Safety. Feil M. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory. Mar 2013. Accessed May 24, 2021. http://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Documents/201303_01.pdf.

        • Sevdalis N.
        • et al.
        Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.
        World J Surg. 2014; 38: 751-758
        • Weigl M.
        • et al.
        The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons’ perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2015; 29: 145-153
        • Haidet K.K.
        • et al.
        Methods to improve reliability of video-recorded behavioral data.
        Res Nurs Health. 2009; 32: 465-474
        • Campbell G.
        • Arfanis K.
        • Smith A.F.
        Distraction and interruption in anaesthetic practice.
        Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109: 707-715
        • Rubin J.D.
        • Brown S.L.
        • Safran A.
        Best practices avoid retained sponges.
        Same Day Surg. 2012 Jul 1; 36: 75-76
        • Koh R.Y.I.
        • et al.
        Cognitive factors influencing the management of interruptions during surgical counts.
        Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2011; 55: 680-684
        • Riley R.
        • Manias E.
        • Polglase A.
        Governing the surgical count through communication interactions: implications for patient safety.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 369-374
      2. Surgery staff reduces count problems by 50%.
        Same Day Surg. 2012 Jul 1; 36: 73-74
        • Ricci M.A.
        • Brumsted J.R.
        Crew resource management: using aviation techniques to improve operating room safety.
        Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012; 83: 441-444
        • Karl R.
        Briefings, checklists, geese, and surgical safety.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 8-11
        • Clark G.J.
        Strategies for preventing distractions and interruptions in the OR.
        AORN J. 2013; 97: 702-707
        • Operating Room Nurses Association of Canada (ORNAC)
        ORNAC Standards, Guidelines and Position Statements for Perioperative Registered Nurses.
        14th ed. ORNAC, Bath, ON2019
        • Grundgeiger T.
        • et al.
        Interruption management in the intensive care unit: predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support.
        J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010; 16: 317-334
        • Wickens C.D.
        • et al.
        An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering.
        2nd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ2003
        • Schnock K.O.
        • et al.
        Evaluating the impact of radio frequency identification retained surgical instruments tracking on patient safety: literature review.
        J Patient Saf. Epub. 2017 Feb 22;
        • Johns G.
        • Saks A.M.
        Organizational Behaviour: Understanding and Managing Life at Work.
        Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston2001
        • Sacks G.D.
        • et al.
        Teamwork, communication and safety climate: a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical culture.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 458-467
        • Cafazzo J.A.
        • St-Cyr O.
        From discovery to design: the evolution of human factors in healthcare.
        Healthc Q. 2012; 15 (Spec No): 24-29