Advertisement

Longitudinal Evaluation of a Pediatric Rapid Response System with Realist Evaluation Framework

Published:January 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.01.004

      Background

      Rapid response (RR) systems’ impact on clinical outcomes is influenced by institutional social factors. This study applied the realist evaluation (context-mechanism-outcomes) framework to review significant RRs defined as REACT (Rapid Escalation After Critical Transfer) events for appraising a pediatric RR system.

      Methods

      REACT events included all RRs with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) and/or ventilation and/or hemodynamic support instituted within 24 hours after RR. A continuous quality improvement process was employed to identify, debrief, and review REACT events to recognize and act on RR mechanistic and contextual deficiencies. The aim was to decrease REACT events with mechanistic/contextual gaps categorized into crisis resource management (CRM) themes by 25% over three years while ensuring process sustainability.

      Results

      From 2015 to 2019, 5,581 RR events occurred, of which 67.2% transferred to ICU, and 1,392 (24.9%) were identified as REACTs. In the first two years, 100% identification and review within three months of 90% REACTs was accomplished. One hundred percent of the 17 providers ascertained that the process was safe and transparent, and 80.0% of respondents expressed their commitment from perceived benefit to patient care. Over five years, the proportion of REACTs with CRM gaps decreased from 62.3% to 26.5%, those with multiple deficiencies reduced from 72.5% to 23.2%, and CPAs outside ICUs decreased from 15 to 3 per year. Improvement actions included modifications to RR system (activation, process, and management), hospital (resources and policies), dedicated RR training, and sharing of positive feedback.

      Conclusion

      The realist evaluation framework facilitated holistic assessment of an RR system. Review of REACTs was feasible, sustainable, and yielded useful information to guide systemwide improvement.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berwick DM
        • et al.
        The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality.
        JAMA. 2006 Jan 18; 295: 324-327
      1. The Joint Commission. Patient Safety Systems (PS). Jan 2021. Accessed Jan 20, 2022. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/ps-chapters/camh_04a_ps_all_current.pdf.

        • Stolldorf DP
        • Jones CB.
        Deployment of rapid response teams by 31 hospitals in a statewide collaborative.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015; 41: 186-191
        • Lyons PG
        • Edelson DP
        • Churpek MM.
        Rapid response systems.
        Resuscitation. 2018; 128: 191-197
        • Chan PS
        • et al.
        Rapid response teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11; 170: 18-26
        • Bonafide CP
        • et al.
        Impact of rapid response system implementation on critical deterioration events in children.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168: 25-33
        • Bonafide CP
        • et al.
        Development of a pragmatic measure for evaluating and optimizing rapid response systems.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 129: e874-e881
        • Maharaj R
        • Raffaele I
        • Wendon J.
        Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Crit Care. 2015 Jun 12; 19: 254
        • Bonafide CP
        • Roland D
        • Brady PW.
        Rapid response systems 20 years later: new approaches, old challenges.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 1; 170: 729-730
        • Olsen SL
        • et al.
        Succeeding with rapid response systems—a never-ending process: a systematic review of how health-care professionals perceive facilitators and barriers within the limbs of the RRS.
        Resuscitation. 2019; 144: 75-90
        • Brady PW
        • et al.
        Improving situation awareness to reduce unrecognized clinical deterioration and serious safety events.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 131: e298-e308
        • McGaughey J
        • et al.
        Early warning systems and rapid response to the deteriorating patient in hospital: a systematic realist review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2017; 73: 2877-2891
        • Pawson R
        • Tilley N.
        Realistic Evaluation.
        Sage Publications, London1997
        • Bunch JL
        • Groves PS
        • Perkhounkova Y.
        Realistic evaluation of a rapid response system: context, mechanisms, and outcomes.
        West J Nurs Res. 2019; 41: 519-536
        • Bavare AC
        • et al.
        Fostering self-determination of bedside providers to promote active participation in rapid response events.
        Med Educ Online. 2019; 241551028
        • Shearer B
        • et al.
        What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21: 569-575