Advertisement

The Well-Being of Peer Supporters in a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study

Published:April 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.04.005

      Abstract

      Background

      Peer support is an effective, well-received approach to caring for health care professionals who face stress, challenges, and reduced well-being. Peer supporters may be at risk for emotional exhaustion and secondary traumatic stress due to their primary roles and involvement as peer supporters during the COVID-19 pandemic.

      Methods

      Peer supporters from five well-established peer support programs completed surveys (ProQOL and a five-item emotional exhaustion measure) to assess secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, and burnout during the pandemic. Analysis of variance models analyzed differences in these well-being outcomes by role, age, years in health care, and working in high-risk areas. Qualitative content analysis was performed for open-response questions about challenges, needs, and successful well-being strategies using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis.

      Results

      A total of 375 peer supporters completed the survey between spring and summer 2021 for a response rate of about 38%. Most participants had low secondary traumatic stress and moderate to high compassion satisfaction; nearly 44% had concerning levels of emotional exhaustion. Compassion satisfaction was significantly lower (p = 0.003) and emotional exhaustion significantly higher (p < 0.001) among the youngest cohort, and both compassion satisfaction and emotional exhaustion differed across career stages (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04, respectively). Emotional exhaustion was significantly higher in peer supporters working in COVID units than in non-COVID units (p = 0.021). Peer supporters identified numerous protective and risk factors associated with serving as a peer supporter.

      Conclusion

      Despite having moderate to high levels of compassion satisfaction, peer supporters report high levels of burnout and numerous challenges and needs to sustain their well-being. To maintain effective peer support programs during the ongoing pandemic, health care organizations must study and support the well-being of health care professional peer supporters.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shanafelt TD
        • et al.
        Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90: 1600-1613
        • De Hert S.
        Burnout in healthcare workers: prevalence, impact and preventative strategies.
        Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Oct 28; 13: 171-183
        • Davis M
        • et al.
        Confronting depression and suicide in physicians: a consensus statement.
        JAMA. 2003 Jun 18; 289: 3161-3166
      1. National Academy of Medicine. Burnout Among Health Care Professionals: a Call to Explore and Address This Underrecognized Threat to Safe, High-Quality Care. Dyrbye LN, et al. Discussion paper. Jul 5, 2017. Accessed 1 May 2022. https://nam.edu/burnout-among-health-care-professionals-a-call-to-explore-and-address-this-underrecognized-threat-to-safe-high-quality-care/.

        • Maslach C
        • Jackson SE.
        The measurement of experienced burnout.
        J Organ Behav. 1981; 2: 99-113
      2. Figley CR. Catastrophes: an overview of family reaction. In: Figley CR, McCubbin HI, editors: Stress and the Family, vol. 2, Coping with Catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983. 3–20.

        • Bourke ML
        • Craun SW.
        Coping with secondary traumatic stress: differences between UK and US child exploitation personnel.
        Traumatology. 2014; 20: 57-64
        • Hall LH
        • et al.
        Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8; 11e0159015
        • Shanafelt TD
        • et al.
        Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 995-1000
        • Bodenheimer T
        • Sinsky C.
        From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.
        Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 573-576
        • Brooks SK
        • et al.
        A systematic, thematic review of social and occupational factors associated with psychological outcomes in healthcare employees during an infectious disease outbreak.
        J Occup Environ Med. 2018; 60: 248-257
        • Kinman G
        • Teoh K
        • Harriss A.
        Supporting the well-being of healthcare workers during and after COVID-19.
        Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Jul 17; 70: 294-296
        • Lai J
        • et al.
        Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2; 3e203976
        • Orrù G
        • et al.
        Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5; 18: 337
        • Dekker S.
        Second Victim: Error, Guilt, Trauma, and Resilience.
        CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL2013
        • Hu YY
        • et al.
        Physicians’ needs in coping with emotional stressors: the case for peer support.
        Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 212-217
        • Scott SD
        • et al.
        Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010; 36: 233-240
        • van Pelt F.
        Peer support: healthcare professionals supporting each other after adverse medical events.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2008; 17: 249-252
        • Dukhanin V
        • et al.
        Case: a second victim support program in pediatrics: successes and challenges to implementation.
        J Pediatr Nurs. 2018; 41: 54-59
        • Edrees H
        • et al.
        Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study.
        BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 30; 6e011708
        • Merandi J
        • et al.
        Deployment of a second victim peer support program: a replication study.
        Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 Jun 21; 2: e031
        • Hirschinger LE
        • Scott SD
        • Hahn-Cover K.
        Clinician support: five years of lessons learned.
        Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare. Epub 2015 Apr 3;
        • Finney RE
        • et al.
        Implementation of a second victim peer support program in a large anesthesia department.
        AANA J. 2021; 89: 235-244
        • Godfrey KM
        • Scott SD.
        At the heart of the pandemic: nursing peer support.
        Nurse Lead. 2021; 19: 188-193
        • Quevillon RP
        • et al.
        Helping the helpers: assisting staff and volunteer workers before, during, and after disaster relief operations.
        J Clin Psychol. 2016; 72: 1348-1363
      3. National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Psychological First Aid: Field Operations Guide, 2nd ed. Brymer M, et al. 2006. Accessed 1 May 2022. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/type/PFA/PFA_V2.pdf

        • Choi YJ.
        Psychological first-aid experiences of disaster health care workers: a qualitative analysis.
        Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 14: 433-436
        • Baum N.
        Shared traumatic reality in communal disasters: toward a conceptualization.
        Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010; 47: 249-259
        • Halpern J
        • Tramontin M.
        Disaster Mental Health: Theory and Practice.
        Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA2007
        • Nuttman-Shwartz O.
        Shared resilience in a traumatic reality: a new concept for trauma workers exposed personally and professionally to collective disaster.
        Trauma Violence, Abuse. 2015; 16: 466-475
        • Connors CA
        • et al.
        RISE: Exploring volunteer retention and sustainability of a second victim support program.
        J Healthc Manag. 2021; 66: 19-32
      4. Hudnall Stamm B. Professional Quality of Life Measure: Compassion, Satisfaction, and Fatigue (ProQOL), Version 5. 2009. Accessed 1 May 2022. https://proqol.org/proqol-measure.

        • Sexton JB
        • et al.
        Providing feedback following Leadership WalkRounds is associated with better patient safety culture, higher employee engagement and lower burnout.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27: 261-270
        • Sexton JB
        • Adair KC.
        Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
        BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20; 9e022695
        • Braun V
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Kelly L
        • Runge J
        • Spencer C.
        Predictors of compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in acute care nurses.
        J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015; 47: 522-528
        • Buselli R
        • et al.
        Professional quality of life and mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 26; 17: 6180
        • Malliarou M
        • et al.
        ICU nurse's moral distress as an occupational hazard threatening professional quality of life in the time of pandemic COVID 19.
        Mater Sociomed. 2021; 33: 88-93
        • Galanis P
        • et al.
        Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Adv Nurs. 2021; 77: 3286-3302
        • Hunsaker S
        • et al.
        Factors that influence the development of compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in emergency department nurses.
        J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015; 47: 186-194
        • Brewer EW
        • Shapard L.
        Employee burnout: a meta-analysis of the relationship between age or years of experience.
        Human Resource Development Review. 2004 Jun 1; 3: 102-123
        • Shanafelt T
        • Ripp J
        • Trockel M.
        Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety among health care professionalsuring the COVID-19 pandemic.
        JAMA. 2020 Jun 2; 323: 2133-2134
        • de Oliveira Souza D.
        Health of nursing professionals: workload during the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020 Mar 3; 18: 464-471
        • Siedlecki KL
        • et al.
        The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across age.
        Soc Indic Res. 2014 Jun 1; 117: 561-576
        • Kappes M
        • Romero-García M
        • Delgado-Hito P.
        Coping strategies in health care providers as second victims: a systematic review.
        Int Nurs Rev. 2021; 68: 471-481
        • Maslach C
        • Leiter MP.
        How to measure burnout accurately and ethically.
        Harv Bus Rev. Epub. 2021 Mar 19;